Let’s skip the
small talk. Let’s skip the introduction. Last night was the finale and there is
tons to say, so I am just going to jump on in. While I would have preferred a
Jay or David win, Adam deserved the win based off of who he was up against in
the final three. It baffles my mind that there are people who think Ken or
Hannah deserved to win after a season of mediocre play. Adam wasn’t perfect,
but he tried, and he often knew what needed to be done. So let’s talk about the
one thing that angers me about the finale. People keep insinuating that Adam
won because he mentioned his mom’s cancer in his final speech. It’s amazing how
bitter people are that they think that that won him the game. Just like Jeremy
in Second Chances, Adam would have won anyway. Chris said it the best when he
was addressing the final three: the jury gave Adam credit for the big moves
that occurred in the last half of the game. Adam had Chris, Jay, Brett, and
Sunday all before tribal council even began. That means he had this season in
the bag before he even had the chance to mention his mother’s story. May the
story have influenced David and Jessica to not give pity votes to Ken?
Possibly. But it didn’t cause Adam to win. He won on his own merit by being
against Hannah and Ken who did practically nothing all season.
To all of the people who thought Ken or Hannah would win,
may I ask why? Hannah had four things that were preventing her from ever
winning and I predicted just last recap that she would not receive any votes.
1.) She was a flip flopper between alliances. In Big Brother those may win, but
they do not win in Survivor. 2.) Any
move that she may have deserved credit for, like the David vote out, she did
not vocalize to the jury. How are they supposed to know she made it happen when
Adam is the only one who vocalized wanting David out? 3.) The only moves she
did claim were voting out Sunday and Brett. These are two moves the jury and
myself included believed were mistakes. 4.) She was socially unaware the whole
game. She made two connections that were strong enough for votes, David and
Ken. Ken sat next to her and David was always going to vote off of game. People
may not have been annoyed by her, but there is little evidence that they liked
her.
It is difficult to
talk about Ken. He was an early favorite of mine, but he did nothing all season
except win challenges and talk about loyalty. However, he then betrayed his closest
ally David and voted him out. So he went against his only argument as to why
his game play was better by turning on that level of game play. He apparently
also received a good edit because in post finale interviews it appears that the
cast did not even like him that much. Dear fans of alpha male survivor players,
COMPETITION WINS SHOULD NOT EQUAL WINNING SURVIVOR. The worst player in the
entire world with zero strategy or social awareness could win challenges and
make it to the end. It requires no playing of the game or solidifying
relationships to do that. If you have to champion challenge wins as why you
should win the game, it means you completely ignored the fact that Survivor is
a social game first and foremost. If you alienate that aspect of the game, you
shouldn’t win.
So, now on to a more positive topic: I thought I’d do a
retrospective where I pasted my thoughts on the final three from my first
initial thoughts on the season and see how my opinion on them has changed. I
read over my initial thoughts last night and found the contrast to be
hilarious. It’s part of why I enjoy not being spoiled when it comes to
Survivor. It’s interesting to see how my perspective changes.
"Adam:
I really don’t have an impression of him outside of the fact that he talks
REALLY loud when he is giving his confessionals."
It’s hilarious to see that I had
little to no opinion on Adam. During the rest of the season, my opinions on him
fluctuated faster than Hannah flip flopped between groups.
"Hannah:
We go from someone with some intelligence, to someone who miraculously showed
none last night. The target was Figgy until Michelle whispered to her during
tribal to vote out Mari instead. Here’s the kicker: Michelle wouldn’t tell her
the reason until after. HELLO?! If someone won’t tell you the reason until
after you do it, that’s a pretty good reason NOT to do it. Furthermore, the
fact that she was told last minute proves she is on the bottom of the “Kappa
Kappa” alliance, a name that she gave them last episode. So now a showmance and
an alliance that doesn’t need her is strong in this game. She screwed herself."
Right from the start I predicted
that Hannah would make dumb choices due to lack of social awareness. And my opinion
of her never really recovered. While she survived until the end, the reason why
she would never win was apparent from the start.
"Ken:
I like Ken. He seems down to earth and good at challenges. Basically, he is
like my past favorite Joe. The issue is, these guys don’t win. The second they
lose an individual immunity after the merge, they are voted out. I’ll enjoy him
while I can."
All I can say is Ken got lucky
that Jay existed. If Jay had not been winning individual immunities, I have a
feeling that this prediction about Ken would have come true. Though I guess I
was still technically right about him not winning. Joe Anglim he was not.
So now that that fun little
retrospective is over, let’s talk about some rankings for this season. Overall,
it was a pretty enjoyable season. Second Chances and Beauty V Brains V Brawn 2
had dampened my enthusiasm for the show a little bit. I was not as excited
every week to watch. I thought that
would continue this season but since the merge the season was spectacular. The
finale had me on the edge of my seat thinking who would go home when.
Season rating: 8/10
Winner rating: 8/10. Adam was not
the best player of the season, but he deserved it over who he was sitting next
to.
My three favorite players:
1.)
Jay- It should not be a surprise to anyone. I
was fairly obvious in my Jay bias in recent recaps.
2.)
David- His growth was an amazing story to watch
and unlike others, when he made a strategic move it was usually in his best
interests.
3.)
Ken- I am not as fond of him now since his game
really became apparently bad post-merge. However, I really liked him pre-merge
so he still deserves a spot on this list.
So another season of recapping comes to an
end. But have no fear, I won’t be gone until March. Instead in January, I’ll be
returning with recaps for Nick’s season of The Bachelor. I have a feeling that
there will be a lot of mocking to do. Until then, Happy Holidays to all! Make
sure to spend it with family and friends.